Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:27:12 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I was at a linux conference and met someone who sells a tool to patch linux
kernels live without rebooting.
http://www.kspice.com
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> What do other groups do about updating applications and machines
> with long running processes ?
>
> My users run two sorts of long running processes, with different
> problems when it comes to updates.
>
> First, I have users who never log off. Thus applications like
> firefox and pdf viewers will be running when they are updated.
> Some time later these applications may try to load and run plugins
> which have been removed/updated.
>
> Second, I have users with long running calculations (often weeks
> or more) which would be interrupted if the machine were rebooted into an
> updated kernel. User-writing code often check-points, so the actual
> calculation time lost is not significant, but calculations in
> commercial packages such as Mathematica and Maple are often less good
> about check-pointing.
>
> How do people balance the disruption of killing user processes
> against the need to update to the latest versions of software ?
>
> Thanks,
>
|
|
|