SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Tooley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chris Tooley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:35:57 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
On 11-08-03 9:14 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Matej HALAC<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 10:41 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Matej HALAC<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>
>>>> Also host servers get this message in the logs:
>>>>         kernel: kvm: 2323: cpu0 unimplemented perfctr wrmsr: 0xc1 data 0xabcd
>>>>
>>>> I myself have a ML150 G6 with Intel Xeon E5504 that runs SL6 and libvirt
>>>> with a Windows server without a hitch.
>>>>
>>>> Any advice is appreciated since I tried looking for the solution and
>>>> nothing helped me.
>>>
>>> You get this on both servers? If you can spare the time, test one of
>>> the other virtualization technologies.
>>
>> Yes these messages are present on both machines and also the Windows
>> image crashes on both as well. The specific machine worked without
>> problems on my ML150 so I doubt it's a problem with the Guest image.
>
> I'm afraid this is a level of problem where buying a server license
> from our favorite upstream vendor would help get you access to the
> technical support of the people who are actually writing it. And I'm
> afraid I'm not personally very happy with KVM based virtualization. If
> the GUI is that bad, it makes me concerned about the quality of the
> rest of the backend.

To be fair, it's likely that the backend guys are not doing the GUI.

-Chris

ATOM RSS1 RSS2