SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Axel Thimm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:58:20 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (662 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (194 bytes)
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 03:33:10PM +0000, Mark Nelson wrote:
> I'm about to purchase a couple of new systems, my supplier can only
> supply me with a AMD 64 (this is due to a couple of hardware
> computability issues), can I run the 32 bit version of SL4 on a AMD
> 64, I know I'll take a performance hit but I'm not that bothered
> about that.  Can anyone see any issues?

As everybody confirmed, there are no issues, AMD64 is designed in such
a way (that's why you can also use Windows on them ...).

But why would you want to do so? SL x86_64 has multilib support, so
any 32 bit application you have in mind should work with the 64 bit
version.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


ATOM RSS1 RSS2