Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:33:42 +0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Paul A. Rombouts wrote:
>> Er:
>> 15:05 [summer@numbat ~]$ sudo rpm -Fvh
>> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/seamonkey-1.1.2-1.i386.rpm
>> /usr/src/re
>> dhat/RPMS/i386/seamonkey-mail-1.1.2-1.i386.rpm
>> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/seamonkey-chat-1.1.2-1.i386.rp
>> m /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.1.2-1.i386.rpm
>> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/seamonkey- dom-inspector-1.1.2-1.i386.rpm
>> Password:
>> Preparing...
>> ########################################### [100%]
>> 1:seamonkey
>> ########################################### [ 50%]
>> error: %post(seamonkey-1.1.2-1.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 255
>> 2:seamonkey-mail
>> ########################################### [100%]
>> error: %post(seamonkey-mail-1.1.2-1.i386) scriptlet failed, exit
>> status 255
>> error: %preun(seamonkey-1.0.8-0.2.el4.i386) scriptlet failed, exit
>> status 255
>> 15:05 [summer@numbat ~]$
>
>
> I am not exactly sure what is causing the rpm scriplets to fail in your
I presume that means you're as clueless as I am:-)
> case, but I recommend first completely uninstalling (using rpm -e) all
> the old seamonkey packages before installing the new ones.
I don't particularly like unsolved mysteries, but this is certainly
worth a try.
Later, when I'm not using it to read my email.
>
> There are some important differences between the way seamonkey is
> packaged in RHEL4 and in the rpms available from releases.mozilla.org.
> For instance, in RHEL4 seamonkey is split into 10 packages:
>
> seamonkey
> seamonkey-chat
> seamonkey-devel
> seamonkey-dom-inspector
> seamonkey-js-debugger
> seamonkey-mail
> seamonkey-nspr
> seamonkey-nspr-devel
> seamonkey-nss
> seamonkey-nss-devel
>
> The src rpm from releases.mozilla.org builds into only 5 binary packages:
>
> seamonkey
> seamonkey-chat
> seamonkey-dom-inspector
> seamonkey-js-debugger
> seamonkey-mail
>
> Thus if you use "rpm -U" or "rpm -F" to upgrade, you will not get rid of
> all the old RHEL4 packages if you do not uninstall them first.
>
>
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[log in to unmask] [log in to unmask]
Please do not reply off-list
|
|
|