SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Mansour <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Mansour <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:25:18 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
Hi,

> Oh,
> 
> I checked to see if i2c was in kernel-unsupported by looking at the 
> x86_64 kernel-smp-unsupported rpm - which doesn't contain the i2c 
> stuff for some reason.  I'm installing the 32bit kernel-smp-
> unsupported now to get i2c...
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom

ATrpms have RPM packages available for RHEL which supply the i2c packages. I
use them as a yum repository and have used these packages, they work fine.

Michael.

> Ryan Enge wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > I have it running on several systems (3.0.3-3.0.4), you need to 
> > install kernel-unsupported to get the i2c stuff. Once I had that and 
> > lm_sensors installed I ran "sensors-detect" to setup the modules 
> > required to check the sensors and then ran "sensors" to see the output 
> > (all should work provided your modules are included with 
> > kernel-unsupported otherwise you will need to do some compiling).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ryan Enge
> > System Admin
> > UVic Physics & Astronomy
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >
> > Tom Rockwell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Anybody have lm_sensors running on scientific linux?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tom Rockwell
> >>
------- End of Original Message -------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2