Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:29:59 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 2011-10-17, at 9:20 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 06:38 AM, Mark Stodola wrote:
> [...]
> Now I have a decision to make: IA-32 SL 6.1 or X86-64 SL 6.1 . The
> processor will support X86-64, but the machine only has 4 Mbyte of RAM
> as delivered (upgradeable to 8 Mbyte -- but this is a cost) -- which is
> only 0.5 Mword in X86-64 64 bit mode. The hard drive is 500 Gbyte SATA
> at 5400 RPM -- not a high performance unit.
>
> There is no special need for 64 bit work on the machine that primarily
> is an end-user linux workstation: web browser (including use of
> university services only available through such an interface), IMAP
> email client, OpenOffice, various LaTeX interfaces, some display of
> video, use of Linux VirtualBox to use MS Win (for which the unit is
> licensed) to use a MS Win only application, but no development or
> programming -- and the ability for a skilled end user under Network
> Manager to connect to whatever 802.11 WAP that is available without my
> intervention.
>
> Thus, my feeling is to stay with the IA-32 environment. Any thoughts to
> the contrary?
>
> Yasha Karant
I would recommend using 64 bit for any virtual machine usage. Besides which, I think the only thing that wasn't 64 bit on linux for desktops was flash-plugin - which, I think is no longer the case (I cannot find any references though, anyone care to correct/confirm me?)
-Chris
|
|
|