Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 23 May 2015 20:46:51 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 05/23/2015 08:45 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 05/23/2015 03:46 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:16 AM, ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/20/2015 03:36 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That means that once a new major release of RHEL is out, it aims to be
>>>> rock solid and stable for a long time
>>>
>>> Sometimes. Other times it freezes bugs and instabilities in
>>> place, like the kvm bugs I reported. It is a double edges sword.
>>
>> AFAIR, the kvm bugs that you reported were RFEs.
>>
>> Within a release, RH's very conservative when considering RFEs and
>> rarely if ever does it do apply them; by default, it only fixes "real"
>> bugs.
>>
>
> I was being polite. And not all of them were reported as RFE's.
>
>
I find telling someone that is doing volunteer work for you
to please hurry up and fix their s*** usually gets you kill filed!
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|