On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Bonnie King wrote:
>
>> Synopsis:          Critical: firefox security update
>> Advisory ID:       SLSA-2013:0981-1
>> Issue Date:        2013-06-25
>
>> SL5
>>  x86_64
>>    firefox-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm
>>    firefox-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm
>>    firefox-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm
>>    firefox-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm
>>    xulrunner-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm
>>    xulrunner-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm
>>    xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm
>>    xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm
>
> I can't find the xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9 packages in 
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/x86_64/updates/security/
> (the i386.rpm *is* in 
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/i386/updates/security/

No it isn't. I can't tell devel from debuginfo :-( sorry.

The question should have been; should we remove
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/x86_64/updates/security/xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.5-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm
?

It is in
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/archives/debuginfo/
where I would expect to find it.

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna