SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:14:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
On 10/25/2013 11:04 AM, Brian Lin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've run into a problem when updating some of our packages on SL5.8 that depend on java-1.7.0-openjdk, namely dependency failures when any of the following three packages try to update:
>
> java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10
> java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10
> java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10
>
> This is because they all have the following requirement:
>
> java-1.7.0-openjdk = 1:1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10
>
> Which appears to be missing from the security repo (latest version available is java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.4.el5_9). Glancing at the repos, it looks like it affects all SL5 versions.
>
> Related announcement: http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1310&L=scientific-linux-errata&T=0&P=1969
>
> Thanks,
> Brian

Hi Brian,

Thanks for the report!

Not too sure how that happened. 
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.45-2.4.3.1.el5_10.{i386,x86_64}.rpm was in the 
package set I pushed out.

I'll get it cleaned up and see about what went wrong.

Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2