SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Frank Schluenzen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Frank Schluenzen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:22:54 +0200
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (41 lines)
Hi also,

>> 
>> I get this problem when I try to update to the latest kdebase:
>> 
>> # yum check-update
>> Setting up repositories
>> Reading repository metadata in from local files
>> 
>> kdebase.i386                             6:3.1.3-5.16           sl308errata
>> 
>> # yum -y update kdebase.i386
>> Setting up Update Process
>> Setting up repositories
>> Reading repository metadata in from local files
>> Resolving Dependencies
>> --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
>> ---> Package kdebase.i386 6:3.1.3-5.16 set to be updated
>> --> Running transaction check
>> --> Processing Dependency: libsensors.so.1 for package: kdebase
>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>> Error: Missing Dependency: libsensors.so.1 is needed by package kdebase
>> 
>
> I have just triple checked, and kdebase updates fine on a normally installed 
> machine.
> Do you have lm_sensors excluded in your yum.conf?
> But then, how would you get kdebase installed in the first place.
>

I also didn't see problems updating kdebase, but am kind of surprised that 
the previous version of ksysguardd (kdebase 3.1.3-5.11) was apparently not 
linked against libsensors, so prior to 3.1.3-5.16 there was at least no 
libsensors.so.1 dependency ?!

NB: centos rpm's (eg 3.1.3-5.11) behave more like expected, as ksysguardd 
and the package itself depend on libsensors.so.1, which is not the case 
for the same package from SL308 ...

Ciao, Frank.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2