SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: NVIDIA 9746 problem
From:
Axel Thimm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Scientific Linux Users mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:58:27 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (824 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (194 bytes) 
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:41:27PM +0200, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> OK, thanks for the feedback. I have filed an issue on NVIDIA site.

OK, URL would be nice so someone googling into the artchives later
will be able to follow the trail.

> Something else, in logs it is mentioned that AGP 2x was detected. However 
> it is an AGP 8x graphics card, placed on AGP 4x slot. I checked the BIOS 
> and it is at AGP 4x. Any ideas why this is happening? (I mean something 
> like SL supports up to AGP 2x only, or something).

I can't really say, I seldom deploy RHEL/SL on anything that has
that much graphic power on it :)

Why shouldn't SL support higher AGP modes? RH will not have added
extra graphics support to 2.6.9 as this is not their business case,
but 2.6.9 should already be doing decent AGP, or not?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

ATOM RSS1 RSS2