SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:16:46 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:51:19PM -0800, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> 
> Again - the reason for 32 bit is not that I cherish old CPUs ...
>> 
> And that is why I ask here; if anybody runs old machines for
> compatibility reasons, it would be experimental scientists ...
>

On target you are.

Us experimental scientists have embedded computers (VME form factor)
with 32-bit CPUs and 0.5GB/1GB RAM. We run 32-bit SL4, SL5 and SL6
on them today and I expect we will still be using these machines
when SL6 becomes obsolete in 1-2-3 years. By then, I fully expect a 32-bit
port of SL7/CentOS7 to become available, somehow.

But for today, I have not even digested the 64-bit SL7 yet, 32-bit SL7
is not even on the wish list yet.

Now, the ARM SL7 is a different matter. *that* I want yesterday.

-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2