SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lamar Owen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lamar Owen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:00:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
On 01/30/2013 12:16 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> One more minor detail I forgot. Full install of SL is just a few GB, 
> if you clone by rsync, takes a few minutes to copy. With "dd", it will 
> take hours to clone a 3TB/4TB disk. 
Clonezilla is smart enough to not copy free space on filesystems that 
partimage supports.

The dd and ddrescue methods, of course, copy everything, and for really 
large disks take a long time.

An rsync copy is not a clone, in the strict sense, but a copy.  A clone 
is bit-for-bit identical.  There are advantages and disadvantages to 
each method.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2