SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Siddall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeff Siddall <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:52:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On 12/10/2013 07:07 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 02:43:14PM -0500, Jeff Siddall wrote:
>> On 12/09/2013 11:20 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>>>> then you absolutely want to be running
>>>> them against a snapshot rather than a live FS and LVM makes this easy.
>>>
>>> Never really cared for LVM.  Always used the direct partition approach.
>>
>> Well, perhaps I can try to convince you some more.
>>
>> Take another example of upgrading to a bigger disk.
>>
>
>
> You mean "upgrade all the disks in the raid array". Surely you do not run
> any important machines with single disks?

Sure, but it will work either way.  I run workstations without RAID and 
servers with RAID and the advantages of having an abstraction layer 
between the FS and the hardware -- or the FS and another redundancy 
layer like MD -- are comparable.

Jeff

ATOM RSS1 RSS2