SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: usb patch
From:
Always Learning <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Always Learning <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Nov 2011 02:10:40 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 17:24 -0700, Yasha Karant wrote:

> (why is everyone so loath to use the name Red Hat that
>  is all over the source code for SL?)

Because Red Hat lawyers badly frightened (bullied probably) Centos and
might have done the same to SL too. Red Hat does not want recompilations
of its sources being regarded by potential customers as having a Red Hat
connection.


Paul
England
EU.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2