Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:00:20 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 03/31/2012 06:17 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
> Hi Nico Kadel-Garcia!
>
> On 2012.03.30 at 22:34:37 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote next:
>
>>
>>> I haven't, but just wanted to say that both VirtualBox and VMWare Player
>>> run fine under SL6.0, and provide a much better user experience than KVM.
>>> I've run XP and and W7 with no issues using VBox and VMWare.
>>>
>> KVM has allegedly gotten better, and with the direct support of our
>> favorite upstream vendor it may be a workable enterprise solution. But I
>> still find that the built-in management tools for it were designed by
>> monkeys actually trying to write Hamlet.
>
> I didn't try W8 preview, but earlier W8 beta installed and worked just
> fine under KVM in SL6.1, without any problems. I picked Windows 7 in
> virt-manager during installation.
>
Thank you!
|
|
|