SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:00:20 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On 03/31/2012 06:17 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
> Hi Nico Kadel-Garcia!
>
>   On 2012.03.30 at 22:34:37 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote next:
>
>>
>>> I haven't, but just wanted to say that both VirtualBox and VMWare Player
>>> run fine under SL6.0, and provide a much better user experience than KVM.
>>> I've run XP and and W7 with no issues using VBox and VMWare.
>>>
>> KVM has allegedly gotten better, and with the direct support of our
>> favorite upstream vendor it may be a workable enterprise solution. But I
>> still find that the built-in management tools for it were designed by
>> monkeys actually trying to write Hamlet.
>
> I didn't try W8 preview, but earlier W8 beta installed and worked just
> fine under KVM in SL6.1, without any problems. I picked Windows 7 in
> virt-manager during installation.
>

Thank you!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2