SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: comparison of packages on different repositories
From:
Steve Traylen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Traylen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:04:03 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
> On 12/14/2011 02:51 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:34:50PM -0800, Yasha Karant wrote:
>>> A partial list that I have found includes ElRepo.org, PUIAS, ATrpms, RPMforge.net,
>>> Extra Packages for Enterprise/EPEL, and of course SL 6 itself ...
>> 
>> Please add "SLC 6", the CERN flavour of SL. Contains many additional packages,
>> some only useful at CERN, others generally useful, but avialable
>> only to users inside CERN.
>> 
> If SLC 6 only is available to users inside CERN (presumably anyone with a CERN account that can use the repository through a connection -- possibly a VLAN tunnel -- to onsite CERN) but not to those of us who are not inside CERN -- it seems to me that the repository is of little use except to those at CERN.
> 
> I do repost my question:  how does one compare the various repositories?
> 
> Note that EPEL states:
> 
> Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (or EPEL) is a Fedora Special Interest Group that creates, maintains, and manages a high quality set of additional packages for Enterprise Linux, including, but not limited to, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), CentOS and Scientific Linux (SL).
> 
> EPEL packages are usually based on their Fedora counterparts and will never conflict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise Linux distributions. EPEL uses much of the same infrastructure as Fedora, including buildsystem, bugzilla instance, updates manager, mirror manager and more.
> 
> End quote.  Thus, EPEL claims that EPEL packages will never conflict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise Linux distributions. If this claim is factual, then one presumably can mix EPEL and SL packages (for the same release and architecture) without concern.  I am attempting to discover if this sort of a claim is true for any other of the public repositories.
> 

Take a look here, http://iuscommunity.org/Docs/SafeRepoInitiative was an attempt to define such a safe repository.

Epel and Sl , its almostvtrue but there have been exceptions, e.g Sl has icewm as an addition but epel just added it in the last week or so.

> Yasha Karant

ATOM RSS1 RSS2