SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stephen Berg (Contractor)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephen Berg (Contractor)
Date:
Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:53:18 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
If I switch to using rsync, that will let me get rid of the createrepo 
portion of the task won't it?

I had tried it a year or two ago and something about made it not work 
well for us but I can't recall now what it was. But I'm willing to give 
it another shot.

On 04/10/2013 11:44 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I'd suggest a 'yum clean expire-cache' on the systems not recognizing 
> the new packages. You may have old metadata on them.
>
> I would encourage you to consider mirroring via rsync, rather than 
> reposync. Rsync will let you preserve hardlinks (and we've got a lot 
> of them) which should translate into less space used on your end.
>
> http://www.scientificlinux.org/download/mirroring/mirror.rsync
>
> Pat
>
> On 04/10/2013 11:30 AM, Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote:
>> I have a locally hosted mirror of SL 6.[234] to manage about 200 
>> systems. I use a reposync and createrepo to keep them updated daily. 
>> So far I've been accomplishing my upgrades for minor releases using 
>> yum and haven't had any troubles. But the systems that I've upgraded 
>> to 6.4 are showing some strange yum behavior.
>>
>> After the upgrade the system does not see any updates. For instance 
>> on 6.3 the autofs package is 5.0.5-55, 6.4 has 5.0.5-73. Systems that 
>> I did a yum upgrade on will not see 5.0.5-73 as an available update.
>>
>> What I've tried so far:
>>
>> If I change yum to use the scientificlinux.org repos the updated 
>> package is seen with no problem.
>>
>> I can install the new autofs package with a "yum localinstall 
>> <filename>" and that has no problems so it shouldn't a problem in the 
>> rpm itself unless there's a problem that effects createrepo but not 
>> installation of the rpm.
>>
>> I've poked around in the primary.xml.gz file and it appears to be 
>> correct but I'm not sure that I'd spot a problem in there.
>>
>> It seems to be some problem with the createrepo utility but I've had 
>> no luck finding any errors or warnings to indicate where the fault 
>> might be.
>>
>> I'm going to try to find a spare system that I can do a clean install 
>> of 6.4 and see what happens with that.
>>
>> Does anyone have an idea of what could cause this?
>>
>
>


-- 
Stephen Berg
Systems Administrator
NRL Code: 7320
Office: 228-688-5738
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2