SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL 6 vs. other RHEL clones: security advisory comparison
From:
Ian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ian <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:38:37 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
On 20/08/12 22:45, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/20/2012 04:59 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>> b) delays in issuing bug fixes are good for you - no delay means they
>>     did not test the stuff before pushing it out.
> FUD
>
> - KB
Lol. Karanbir, how are you able to release something derived from 
Redhat, at the same time as Redhat (i.e. without a delay) and do your 
own simultaneous testing? Quantum computing?

Not FUD at all... in fact, it is a truism.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2