SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Morten P.D. Stevens" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Morten P.D. Stevens
Date:
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:13:05 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
> -----Original Message-----

> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:owner-

> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert Hendrickx

> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 4:00 PM

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: SL6 - Bug in upstream httpd package

> 

> Hello,

> 

> I suffer a bug in the SL6 httpd 2.2.15 that was corrected in FC13

> (basically by

> going from 2.2.15 to 2.2.17, see bug report

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624609) but not yet in SL6.

> I temporally corrected it by recompiling the FC13 rpms source of httpd

> 2.2.17

> and it works, but that's not the clean way to do it, as I don't have

> the

> automatic security updates on these packages anymore......

> 

> My problem is I have no idea how to file a bug request (to redhat, SL

> ?), or

> even if it is possible...



Hi Robert,



SL base packages (like apache, kernel...) are 100% binary compatible to the upstream. (RHEL6)



Please report it to https://bugzilla.redhat.com



Best regards,



Morten


ATOM RSS1 RSS2