SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL 304 RC2 x86_64 Error Report
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:24:18 -0600
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (36 lines) 
Petros,

Thanks again for testing.

The scientific-linux-devel list is better as it does not have as many
users.

-Connie Sieh
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Petros Zimourtopoulos wrote:

> | ----------------------------------------------
> | Sent...: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:23 PM
> | From...: "Connie Sieh" <[log in to unmask]>
> | ----------------------------------------------
> | ...
> | Keep on testing and let us know how it goes.
> | 
> | I am also trying to encourage users to read 
> | the SL.releasnotes as we try 
> | to include content that is of use.
> | ...
> 
> Dear Ms. Connie Sieh,
> 
> All right. We will test other, less demanding, hardware 
> in conjunction with the related SL.releasnotes.
> But could you please confirm 
> if this the right list for bug reports?
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Petros Zimourtopoulos
> http://antennas.ee.duth.gr
> 
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2