On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> Sure you can for the most part where do you think scientific linux came
> from.
> But you don't need a license to get them they are all on Red Hat's public
> FTP server along with all the other SRPMS for every other free speech or
> open source piece of software they support. Really the FTP site is the safe
> bet for that because they won't post SRPM's for any proprietary code on
> their public FTP server but the ones you get off of access.redhat.com may
> include proprietary code.
The BETA SRPMS are NOT on Red Hat's public FTP server.
I am not a lawyer so this is only a opinion and not legal advice. I do
NOT think you can redistribute the result since you obtained the SRPM via
"RHN" and not via the public ftp server.
-Connie Sieh
>
>
> -- Sent from my HP Pre3
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> On Jul 16, 2013 13:58, Yi Ding <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> This isn't devtoolset specific, but if someone were to get the SRPMs for
> devtoolset-2 Beta (by using a RHEL license), and were to recompile them
> would they be able to redistribute them?
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2013, Graham Allan wrote:
>
> Thanks, this is wonderful! I wonder how I managed to
> miss that?
>
>
> I forgot to announce it. Will do so soon. In class this week.
>
> -Connie Sieh
>
>
> Graham
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky
> wrote:
> The Scientific Linux build is available at:
>
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoo
> lset/
>
> Pat
>
> On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:
> I was just wondering if this ever
> went anywhere? Obviously I
> appreciate the "no promises" part
> :-) Was it too much of a
> nightmare to build?
>
> I saw that CentOS got to the stage
> of having a test build
> available
> (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/)
> though I
> haven't looked at it.
>
> Graham
>
> On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding
> wrote:
> Awesome. This should
> be really useful for
> us (finally a modern
> era
> compiler on RHEL
> supported by Redhat).
> Let me know if you
> want any
> beta testers.
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012
> at 4:59 PM, Connie
> Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> On Wed, 12
> Sep 2012,
> Patrick J.
> LoPresti
> wrote:
>
> Red
> Hat
> has
> released
> a
> compilation
> environment
> supporting
> C++11
> as
> part
> of
> the
> "Red
> Hat
> Developer
> Toolset"
> for
> RHEL
> 6.x:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/
>
> I
> am
> curious
> to
> know
> whether
> anybody
> has
> recompiled
> this
> for
> Scientific
> Linux,
> whether
> anybody
> has
> an
> interest
> in
> doing
> so,
> etc.
>
>
> I have.
> Working
> on
> releasing
> it. It is
> a bit more
> complicated
> to compile
> than the
> standard
> SL. Have
> to modify
> the build
> system to
> handle it.
> No
> promises
> of course
> (disclaimer).
>
>
>
>
>
|
