SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: kernel-ml is not for production use
From:
Alan Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alan Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:06:36 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
On 1 November 2011 16:42, Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

<snip>

> How does the above lack of warranty from a commercial for-profit vendor
> differ from the "These packages are provided As-Is with no implied warranty
> or support" from el-repo or the similar disclaimer from SL? This is not a
> discussion of specific ElRepo packages, but a general question of interest
> to all users of packages advertised on the SL list -- ElRepo in this
> particular instance.
>
> Yasha Karant

sed 's/ElRepo/ELRepo/'

ATOM RSS1 RSS2