On 07/24/2013 03:07 AM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Bonnie King wrote:
>>
>>> Synopsis:          Critical: firefox security update
>>> Advisory ID:       SLSA-2013:0981-1
>>> Issue Date:        2013-06-25
>>
>>> SL5
>>>  x86_64
>>>    firefox-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm
>>>    firefox-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm
>>>    firefox-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm
>>>    firefox-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm
>>>    xulrunner-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm
>>>    xulrunner-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm
>>>    xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.i386.rpm
>>>    xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm
>>
>> I can't find the xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.7-1.el5_9 packages in 
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/x86_64/updates/security/
>> (the i386.rpm *is* in 
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/i386/updates/security/
>
> No it isn't. I can't tell devel from debuginfo :-( sorry.
>
> The question should have been; should we remove
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/x86_64/updates/security/xulrunner-debuginfo-17.0.5-1.el5_9.x86_64.rpm 
>
> ?
>
> It is in
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/archives/debuginfo/
> where I would expect to find it.
>

Thanks for the information!

I've moved the debuginfo package out of the way.  You were correct, it should 
not have been in 
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/59/x86_64/updates/security/

Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/