SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:08:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Konstantin Olchanski
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 02:43:14PM -0500, Jeff Siddall wrote:
>> On 12/09/2013 11:20 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>> >>then you absolutely want to be running
>> >>them against a snapshot rather than a live FS and LVM makes this easy.
>> >
>> >Never really cared for LVM.  Always used the direct partition approach.
>>
>> Well, perhaps I can try to convince you some more.
>>
>> Take another example of upgrading to a bigger disk.
>>
>
>
> You mean "upgrade all the disks in the raid array". Surely you do not run
> any important machines with single disks?

Or buy a new area and swap to it, keeping the oldaray as backup for a few weeks.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2