Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:23:18 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
If your server is sitting on a secure network, then no, it's not a
problem. If you server is exposed directly to the internet, then
personally I'd keep it on. I think Redhat originally defaulted to it
because of their (paranoid) client base: i.e. defence, finance and
government use.
Mat
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Todd And Margo Chester
Sent: 21 October 2011 03:31
To: Scientific Linux Users
Subject: Is removing selinux a bad idea?
Hi All,
I have always found selinux a pain in the neck, and in past have just
removed it to get my stuff working.
Question: what are the ramifications of just removing selinux from SL
6.1? Is selinux worth the effort?
Many thanks,
-T
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this
e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this
information by a person other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized and may be illegal.
|
|
|