SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:32:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
On 04/08/2014 08:25 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> Well frankly if you need PCI-DSS compliance pay for RHEL. Its honestly
> not that expensive for the few systems that really require it. Only  the
> system's that handle credit cards supposedly require it and in most
> ecommerce companies that's probably 2 to 4 system's so what's the
> problem wit paying $750 a year each for those few systems to not have to
> deal with the problems and giving the stock investors a warm and fuzzy
> feeling. Your time spent on it costs them more money and ti reduces all
> the stress on every one if you buy compliance on the cheap.

Hi Paul,

Is SL not PCI compliant because it is not a commercial
effort?  I thought SL got all the patches the RHEL
got?  Please elucidate.

Oh, and it is a sole proprietor and CHEAP doesn't
begin to describe him.  (Nice guy though.)

Many thanks,
-T

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2