On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Tom H <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Lamar Owen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> On 07/29/2013 10:47 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I believe there was some relevant information in this year's Red Hat
>>>> Enterprise Linux Roadmap
>>>> <http://videos.cdn.redhat.com/2013-summit-platform-2.mp4> at Red Hat Summit.
>>>
>>> See
>>> https://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/dumas_w_0120_rhel_roadmap1.pdf
>>>
>>> See slide 11.
>>>
>>> Also includes info relevant to the large filesystem thread..... Seems EL7
>>> may ship with XFS as the default filesystem if it passes validation. (Slide
>>> 17).
>>>
>>> A very good read; time will tell how much actually comes to pass.
>>>
>>> (I'm personally looking forward to IEEE1588 PTP as shown on slide 38).......
>>
>> It is interesting. I also see Samba 3.x, not Samba 4.x. *Rats*. I was
>> hoping for built-in Active Directory server replacements: guess I'll
>> be rebundling the work I've done backporting Samba 4.0.7 to RHEL 6.
>> And the slides don't say anything about the migration from SysV init
>> scripts to systemd: that is going to be a *serious* adventure for
>> 3rd-party open source components, like EPEL and Repoforge and atrpms.
>
> http://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/poettering_f_0945_getting_ready_for_systemd-the-new-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7-service-manager.pdf

Thanks, good link. I'm just concerned it's going to cause build
problems for *every single open source daemon* as their SRPM's or
.spec files need to have two sets of options, one for the older SysV
init scripts and one for systemd, or need to be split to two different
.spec files. This is going to be so much fun!