On 2011/10/20 08:10, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Thomas Bendler
> <[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>>
>> Secure boot is simply a design mistake. Instead of giving everyone the
>> opportunity to upload own certificates to the certificate store (like
>> browsers do), they implemented a hard coded list of certificates so that
>> only a few systems benefit from secure boot (the general idea of secure boot
>> is fine). This is the problem, the root of trust is moved to the vendors
>> instead of the owner. Unfortunately a lot of commercial interests will most
>> likely push it to the market as it is, so the only hope will be to be able
>> to switch it off.
>
> The only intelligent post in this totally OT thread...

By definition there have been no intelligent posts to this thread. It does not
belong here. That it was posted here indicates the utter lack of intelligence
(can't read and follow directions) of the people wheezing in and starting this
thread.

{o.o}