SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Perret Yannick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 27 May 2005 17:27:29 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
Troy Dawson wrote:

> Hi Yannick,
> I understand that there is probrubly some reason you want to stay with 
> 303, but have you tried the pxe boot with SL 304 on the machine?  I'm 
> just wondering if there is something on the machine that an updated 
> install kernel would fix.
> Troy

Hi,

well, I will try the 304, as I still have some 304 boxes here and the 
installation system can manage it well.

I use 303 because we are waiting for 305 :o)
Most of our problems are not solved with 304
(NFS bug, gcc headers bug...) and are solved
by 303 patches...
So we do not spend many effort in 304 until
305 is out...

> Perret Yannick wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm using PXE installation for our machines
>> without any problems, but this time I
>> get one...
>>
>> I'm trying to install a SL303 / 32 bits on
>> a dual-opteron box.
>> The DHCP works fine, then the 'pxelinux.0'
>> is loaded. It downloads the kernel and the
>> initrd and just after I get a message
>> "Failed to free base memory. Sorry...".
>> And the machine does nothing else...
>>
>> Does anyone fall on this message
>> previously ?
>>
>> By the way, the corresponding kernel/initrd
>> is also used for other dual-opteron boxes
>> (sun v20z) without any problem.
>>
>> Any clues would be appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -- 
>> Yannick Perret
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2