LISTSERV - SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

	LISTSERV Archives
	SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Home
	SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS April 2011

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: submitting bugs OR an apparent bug in ifup
From:	Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:56:15 -0700
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (16 lines)

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Kelsey Cummings <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:22:32AM -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> If this is a bug, I am quite sure it's The Upstream Vendors (TUV) bug.
>>
>> But I'm not sure it's a bug, it might be one of their new "features".
>
> Ah yes.  I think I'll submit it anyway and see what TUV has to say about
> it.  Given the current behavior we'd have to update some of our tools
> and I'd rather avoid that.

Just one word of caution: Be prepared for a long processing time. It
is not rare to see a bug submitted for, say, 5.3 and fixed in 5.6. I
think it depends on the severity.

Akemi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV