SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Q&A: Centos vs SL
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:37:37 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 08:25:40PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:22:23PM -0600, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> 
> > Now that Redhat has bought Centos...
> 
> Red Hat did not buy CentOS.
> 

Please reread the news coverage and the press releases.

My reading between the lines is that CentOS people were made
an offer they could not refuse.

BTW, today, whois shows centos.org as registered by Red Hat. (Used to be
registered by one of the CentOS main developers).

-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2