Jan Iven wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 15:51, Jaroslaw Polok wrote:
> 
>>Hello all
>>
>>
>>>cernlib-2004
>>
>>Please note this is not an official CERN CERNLIB build.

I believe you are correct in that you (meaning CERN, and whoever there 
maintains the cernlib package) should maintain the package if you wish.

Actually, I think that should probrubly be the generic rule of thumb. 
That if the package developer wants to maintain their package, then they 
should, as long as it doesn't create conflicts.

> 
> 
> I also happen to know that a new CERNLIB rebuild (probably bumped to
> version 2005) is to be expected in a few days. Would it be worth
> waiting?
> 

Well, this is only in contrib for right now.  So ... we can just put in 
the newer one when it comes out.  But yes, if you get us the new one 
when it comes out, we'll put it up there.

Perhaps in the next release, if enough people want it, we'll stick it in 
the main S.L. distro.  At that time, then definatly, we should get the 
latest one.

> Regards
> Jan
> 

Troy

-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________