SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Faye Gibbins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Faye Gibbins <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:02:16 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
We found that if you sign them with rpm 3.0 rather than rpm 4 they work 
fine.

We rpm'd rpm 3.0 into a package called rpm3 which we use on our box with 
the yum cache (currently RHEL AS 4). It works a treat with the Sun rpms.

Yours
Faye


Troy Dawson wrote:
> Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> There is another security update for java, and I think we really need 
>>> to get
>>> this one out.  I would like to test the update first though incase it 
>>> causes
>>> anyone problems, so I have put the updates into the testing areas so 
>>> they can
>>> be tested.
>>
>> Can the jdk rpms be signed ?
>> I'd be happy with a separate key from Sun if that is required.
>>
> 
> No
> I'm sorry, but that's the way they come from sun.  They build them 
> really weird, and if we sign them, they break and don't install.
> 
> Troy


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
Faye Gibbins, Computing Officer (Infrastructure Services)
       GeoS KB; Linux, Unix, Security and Networks.
Beekeeper  - The Apiary Project, KB -   www.bees.ed.ac.uk
---------------------------------------------------------

   I grabbed at spannungsbogen before I knew I wanted it.

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body,
registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2