SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2023

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Jun 2023 14:34:56 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
That is very odd.



I've manually verified and corrected the .treeinfo.



In theory it should work for you now.



Pat



On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 01:38 +0000, Robert Wagner wrote:

> 

> Hi Pat,

> 

> 

> I'm seeing this in the base OS for x86_64, with the same results

> under 7, 7.9, and 7Rolling.  Pulled this specific .treeinfo

> from http://mirror.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/mirror/scientificlinux.org/7.9/x8

> 6_64/os/.treeinfo

> 

> 

> These are in the .treeinfo file in the root of the repo:

> 

> [checksums]

> images/efiboot.img =

> sha256:32a210666a025566f4d319102170ba99b890208182fe3f69a9e2fee6c5fff2

> c3

> images/boot.iso =

> sha256:f93d23de9f8569e4946fa3e7e55291a9734de75002bc195552a23b076c080c

> 37

> images/pxeboot/vmlinuz =

> sha256:10179761b2e71ac0f3c9ff5d7beaa57618a9e44df363c3e766850faaf81f8a

> 81

> images/pxeboot/initrd.img =

> sha256:c70283b9fd1d00daf5ad29747843d0b79d0138c03f6073a99b84d8a9fb88b4

> 31

> images/pxeboot/upgrade.img =

> sha256:e808eaa48a32496bb27c68ce6468ab83759a49959023e673b2bc980cc4e36a

> 2a

> 

> 

> Of the 5, only vmlinuz is correct.

> 26c0453811c73d4eb936e2d348c512fa9dad56b767e4dcc7914422df1dbb7500

>  efiboot.img

> d655e0affbcce9ff2f972bd45042ce27227f578c349f472fe92e7a96ae0529da

>  boot.iso

> 10179761b2e71ac0f3c9ff5d7beaa57618a9e44df363c3e766850faaf81f8a81

>  vmlinuz

> 332e038f94ae19d69158e6bb0e058afa3d1e4e6b40d0382ad0a3a94dae8e87aa

>  initrd.img

> b59900cd10296a7bd8ae6c49afeafbde8e02ccdef5f81f8cbe7a508a5c0e5169

>  upgrade.img

> 

> 

> I've read that I might be able to get away with changing my mirror to

> on-demand rather than a full download, so I may try that tomorrow.

> 

> 

> Cheers and thanks,

> 

> 

> Rob

> 

> 

> 

> 

> From: Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>

> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 3:29 PM

> To: Robert Wagner <[log in to unmask]>; scientific-linux-

> users <[log in to unmask]>

> Subject: External: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Checksum issues with

> a couple of packages in .treeinfo

> 

>  

> 

> 

> [You don't often get email from [log in to unmask] Learn why this is

> important athttps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

> 

> On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 21:01 +0000, Robert Wagner wrote:

> > 

> > Greetings,

> > 

> > 

> >    I'm writing because I'm having an issue with mirroring the SL7

> > OS

> > repository locally using our Foreman/Katello instance.

> > 

> > 

> > The issue I'm having is that a couple of the files listed in

> > .treeinfo in the root of the mirrors have incorrect checksums.  I'm

> > wondering if there is any possibility of this being fixed at this

> > point, or if I should not chase this any further.

> > 

> > 

> > Specifically, the sha256sums listed for:

> > images/efiboot.img

> > images/boot.iso

> > 

> > 

> > are incorrect.  Unfortunately, Katello sees these mismatched

> > checksums and dies immediately, rather than skipping those

> > packages.

> > 

> > 

> > If anybody here is having success mirroring SL7 with Katello/RHSM

> > and

> > has any advice, that would be appreciated.

> > 

> > 

> > Best regards,

> > 

> > 

> > Rob Wagner, Canadian Light Source, Inc.

> 

> I'm mirroring SL7x locally with katello and it seems to be working

> for

> me.  Which trees are you showing a checksum error on?

> 

> Pat




ATOM RSS1 RSS2