Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:26:50 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Oct 20, 2011, at 10:30 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have always found selinux a pain in the neck, and in
>> past have just removed it to get my stuff working.
>>
>> Question: what are the ramifications of just removing
>> selinux from SL 6.1? Is selinux worth the effort?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> -T
On 10/20/2011 07:50 PM, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
> SELinux is just a couple of more of steps when configuring the system. Its a not a large deal once you figure out the basic command set. In fact, come of the steps configuring an app for SELinux is even outlined in the man pages and some of the application docs, (notably Samba).
Not finding it in "man smb.conf". Am I blind?
>
> Worse case, you can use the audit file as well as the SELinux Troubleshooter utility to diagnose the issue. In most case, it is easy to resolve.
>
> - Rilindo
What are the ramifications of just disabling selinux? Good idea? Bad Idea?
-T
|
|
|