SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:26:50 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
On Oct 20, 2011, at 10:30 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have always found selinux a pain in the neck, and in
>> past have just removed it to get my stuff working.
>>
>> Question: what are the ramifications of just removing
>> selinux from SL 6.1?  Is selinux worth the effort?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> -T

On 10/20/2011 07:50 PM, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
> SELinux is just a couple of more of steps when configuring the system. Its a not a large deal once you figure out the basic command set.  In fact, come of the steps configuring an app for SELinux is even outlined in the man pages and some of the application docs, (notably Samba).

Not finding it in "man smb.conf".  Am I blind?
>
> Worse case, you can use the audit file as well as the SELinux Troubleshooter utility to diagnose the issue. In most case, it is easy to resolve.
>
>   - Rilindo

What are the ramifications of just disabling selinux?  Good idea?  Bad Idea?

-T

ATOM RSS1 RSS2