SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:30:42 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
On 11/13/2014 05:31 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:12 PM, ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> It about killed me, but I finally managed to get Wine 1.7.30.i686 to
>> compile on SL 6.5 64 bit.
>>
>> Would any of you like my notes on the matter?  They will save
>> you endless hours (Wine's config file is pretty messed up).
>
> Wow
>
> OK, dude, we're impressed.

Thank you.  Coming from you, that is a big compliment.  :-)
I still stand on the shoulder's of giants.

> Do you know how to use 'mock'? Can you RPM
> wrap it, or work from the older RPM's to update them and build them
> with 'mock', so you get a clean list of the dependencies in the .spec
> file?

Hi Nico,

Sadly, I don't know how.

> This definitely looks like something to take to EPEL and ge into
> *their* updated.

My conversations with EPEL pretty much show them only supporting
64 bit apps from here on.  Red Hat shifted a bunch of things
to them too, in an effort to have fewer things themselves
to support.  EPEL is pretty swamped.

This is (my) the running request for 1.7.x Wine in EPEL.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087996

-T

ATOM RSS1 RSS2