SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: issues with kernel-xen.i686 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 and xen-3.0.3-25.0.4.el5
From:
Jan Kundrát <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jan Kundrát <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:55:38 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (544 bytes) , smime.p7s (3516 bytes) 
Troy Dawson wrote:
> RedHat does not do that, or at least they didn't use to do that.  They
> are implementing something that is similiar to what we do.

Thanks for explaining this.

> The xen in SL 5.1 is only at version 3.0.3, not 3.1.  So, it's not too
> big of a jump.
> And despite RedHat's marketing people announcing that RHEL 5.1 will do
> 32 bit paravirtual guest machines on 64 bit hosts, their engineers are
> quick to point out that it doesn't really do it.

Thanks for correction :). In this case, it'd be best to use 5.1's Xen, IMHO.

Cheers,
-jkt

ATOM RSS1 RSS2