SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:04:22 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (21 lines)
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, John Haggerty wrote:

> What is a good way to update Apache's httpd in SL 4?  As far as I can
> see, the repositories all have httpd 2.0.52, but there seem to be
> security issues with versions before the very latest in that branch,
> 2.0.63.  I used to get away with yum upgrades, but this would seem to

TUV(The Upstream Vendor) backports security patches to Apache.  What 
security errata are you concerned about?

-Connie Sieh
> require futzing with rpm's again to upgrade... is there an easy way to
> do this?
>
> -- 
> John Haggerty
> email: [log in to unmask]
> voice/fax: 631 344 2286/4592
> http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/~haggerty
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2