SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:42:02 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
On 11/12/2014 12:18 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: [log in to unmask]
>>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of
>>> ToddAndMargo [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:02 PM
>>> To: scientific-linux-users
>>> Subject: 348 updates?
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>       348 updates?  Did we, by chance, just go to SL 6.6?
>>>
>>> -T
>
> On 11/12/2014 12:12 PM, Steven C Timm wrote:
>> This is what Pat referred to a couple weeks ago of a bunch of SL 6.6
>> errata that would be available
>> as security updates to the older SL6's.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> Happy to have them, but "huh".  I am still on 6.5:
>
>       $ cat /etc/redhat-release
>       Scientific Linux release 6.5 (Carbon)
>
> Is 6.6 about to hit?
>
> -T
>

ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
libwrap.so.0 is needed by pulseaudio-libs-0.9.21-17.el6.i686
Please report this error at 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Red$20Hat$20Enterprise$20Linux$206&component=yum

Chuckle

I will repeat from the command line with "--skip-broken".  After
that it will be a lot easier to fix the depsolve

ATOM RSS1 RSS2