SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Scott Weikart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Scott Weikart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:49:01 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:25:54 +0000 David Crick <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Signed SHA*SUMs did briefly appear on the main and
> mirror download sites for the installation ISOs.
>
> However, once the Live ISOs were uploaded, its
> (unsigned) SHA*SUMs were merged with the install
> ISOs' SHA*SUMs, and replaced with a single UNsigned
> file.
>
> I did retrieve a copy of the signed SHA256SUM file
> for the install ISOs before it was replaced, and include
> it below.

Did you (or anyone else) capture signed copies of any of the
.SHA1SUM or .md5sum files for the SL.5x.*.iso files?

I need SL-5 to install a Xen host/hypervisor (which will
have numerous SL-6 guests).

-scott

ATOM RSS1 RSS2