SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 May 2015 20:56:25 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
On 05/13/2015 07:20 PM, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:59 PM, ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Intel's C224 chipset supports Intel's Rapid Storage
>> Technology Enterprise (RSTe).  He "e" is for "Enterprise".
>> It can be used for RAID 0, 1, 10.
>>
>> Anyone have any experience with this?  Good, bad,
>> indifferent?
>
> This is what the Linux folks call "fake RAID". It is not a hardware
> RAID controller; it is just an on-disk RAID format that the BIOS can
> understand. (So, for example, a RAID 1 boot disk pair can lose either
> drive and the BIOS can still boot from it.)
>
> You manage these gadgets with mdadm, just like any software RAID. See
> http://www.intel.com/support/chipsets/rste/sb/CS-033622.htm for
> details.
>
> It works fine if what you want is a redundant boot drive done simply.
>
>   - Pat
>

Hi Pat,

Thank you!

Would it be faster, slower, or about the same as a dedicated
LSI (or similar) controller when used in a high end workstation?

-T


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2