SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vaclav Mocek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vaclav Mocek <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:58:23 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
On 04/14/2011 03:08 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Vaclav Mocek<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>> On 04/14/2011 05:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> You need to go *straight* to VMWare. Do not stop at Xen, do not stop
>>> at KVM. Go right to commercial grade support, and install an ESX
>>> server if you can.
>> Why should the better choice be ESX than KVM for somebody who is familiar
>> with Linux?
> If you need to ask then you have not (seriously) used ESX(i) ;-)
>
> The differences are (still) so big, it's not even funny.
You are right, I have not used ESX yet. I was looking for some 
comparison ESX versus KVM, but what I found, was mostly outdated.

The one of newest is http://blog.delouw.ch/tag/kvm/ and the described 
drawbacks should not be a huge issue for an average user, not mentioned 
the fact, that RH is working to improve KVM.


Vackav M.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2