On 03/15/2012 02:57 PM, g wrote:
>
> On 03/15/2012 07:39 PM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> I hate being such a PITR, but have to ask: Is there an ETA for those
>> updates? What's the problem? Yes it's 3.x ->  10.x, but it has been obvious
>> for weeks that this would happen eventually. CentOS got those out 24h ago.
>> What about SL? Any chance we'll see rebuilds at least in
>> {5,6}rolling/testing tomorrow?
> -=-
>
> before you go jumping into 'latest and greatest' from mozilla,
> you should check out their mailing lists and/or news groups.
>
>
> there is nothing 'great' about all the problems i am seeing
> on their list.
>
>

Does the above "nothing 'great'" mean that the content on:

http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html

and similar URLs for other Mozilla applications, is not anything about 
which to be concerned?  Have these security updates been backported by 
TUV into what are nominally earlier releases of the various Mozilla 
applications?

If this is not the case, why are the security concerns not important?

Yasha Karant