Seems like a problem for whoever made that RPM.

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Fernando M. Roxo da Motta wrote:

>   I don't know if this is the correct forum for problems of non Scientific
> Linux distribution packages.   If not, please, educate me about this.
>
>
>   I've issued the command :
>
> $ gpg --recv-keys 4812C85C
> gpg: gpg: requesting key 4812C85C from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net
> unable to execute program `/usr/lib/gnupg/gpgkeys_hkp': No such file or
> directory
> gpg: no handler for keyserver scheme `hkp'
> gpg: keyserver receive failed: keyserver error
>
>   Oops ....   How come ?
>
> $ rpm -qil gnupg
> Name        : gnupg                        Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version     : 1.4.2                             Vendor: ATrpms.net
> Release     : 0_27.el4.at                   Build Date: Sun Oct 16
> 11:09:41 2005
> Install Date: Tue Oct 25 15:14:25 2005      Build Host:
> g77.physik.fu-berlin.de
> Group       : Applications/System           Source RPM:
> gnupg-1.4.2-0_27.el4.at.src.rpm
> Size        : 4577754                          License: GPL
> Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Sun Oct 16 11:09:46 2005, Key ID 508ce5e666534c2b
> Packager    : ATrpms <http://ATrpms.net/>
> URL         : http://www.gnupg.org/
> Summary     : A GNU utility for secure communication and data storage.
> Description :
> GnuPG (GNU Privacy Guard) is a GNU utility for encrypting data and
> creating digital signatures. GnuPG has advanced key management
> capabilities and is compliant with the proposed OpenPGP Internet
> standard described in RFC2440. Since GnuPG doesn't use any patented
> algorithm, it is not compatible with any version of PGP2 (PGP2.x uses
> only IDEA for symmetric-key encryption, which is patented worldwide).
> /usr/bin/gpg
> =============8<-----  clipped to reduce traffic  ---------------
> /usr/lib/gnupg
> /usr/lib/gnupg/gnupg
> /usr/lib/gnupg/gnupg/gpgkeys_finger
> /usr/lib/gnupg/gnupg/gpgkeys_hkp
> /usr/lib/gnupg/gnupg/gpgkeys_http
> =============8<-----  clipped to reduce traffic  ---------------
>
>   It seems that there is an exceeding "gnupg" level for the schemes needed
> for Gnupg.
>
>   As far as I could verify, the original package (gnupg-1.2.6-1.i386.rpm)
> does not have this problem, although it seems to lack the some useful
> schemes.
>
>
>   HTH.
>
>
>   Roxo
>
> --
> ---------------- Non luctari, ludare -------------------+ WYSIWYG Editor ?
> Fernando M. Roxo da Motta <[log in to unmask]>               |  VI !!
> Except where explicitly stated I speak on my own behalf.| I see text,
>       ( Usuário Linux registrado #39505 )               | I get text !
>

--
 /------------------------------------+-------------------------\
|Stephen J. Gowdy                     | SLAC, MailStop 34,       |
|http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~gowdy/ | 2575 Sand Hill Road,     |
|http://calendar.yahoo.com/gowdy      | Menlo Park CA 94025, USA |
|EMail: [log in to unmask]       | Tel: +1 650 926 3144     |
 \------------------------------------+-------------------------/