Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:41:14 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi,
Since we have a month to test this, can you send me the exact rpm version and
the version of linux that you sign them on. We'll give it a shot. We haven't
tried signing the 1.6 jdk's, and if we can get it setup and tested, that would
be great.
Thanks
Troy
Faye Gibbins wrote:
> We rsync our updates from SL and then move the java ones into a separate
> repo to avoid recent problems with unsigned packages.
>
> We then sign them with rpm v3, which with Sun java rpms is often the
> only way.
>
> Problem solved.
>
> Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>>
>>> P.P.S. I am puzzled why yum does not have the obvious improvement,
>>> where if
>>> you install 100 packages and yum does not like 1 of them, it still
>>> installs
>>> the 99 packages it is happy with.
>> That would be nice, though it isn't trivial to work out which
>> of the 99 will work without the 1. Worst case you could degenerate
>> into an n-squared dependency search.
>>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|