SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:18:46 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (34 lines)
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:

> A.S wrote:
>>  Hi all,
>>  When You make new version SL ?
>>
>>  with  Qt4, Kdev 3.5, OpenOffice 3 ?
>>
>>  TIA,
>>  Rav
>
> Whenever RedHat does.
> We are not creating Scientific Linux from scratch, we are recompiling from 
> RedHat Enterpirse Linux.  Basic things, like what you listed, are not items 
> that we change.
> If you want the latest and the greatest, then Scientific Linux is probably 
> not for you.  I would suggest Fedora, or some derivative of it.

Not to disagree with any of that but sl5 already includes Qt4 (in the qt4* 
packages of course).

We add openoffice (currently 3.1.0) to our sl5 machines with no problems 
at all RH have always been a bit slow for that one...  [ I'm not sure I 
know what Kdev is but we don't seem to install it. ]

-- 
/--------------------------------------------------------------------\
| "Computers are different from telephones.  Computers do not ring." |
|       -- A. Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks", p. 32                  |
---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jon Peatfield, _Computer_ Officer, DAMTP,  University of Cambridge |
| Mail:  [log in to unmask]     Web:  http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/ |
\--------------------------------------------------------------------/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2