On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, don martino wrote:

> --e89a8ff1c63093d87c04d49d4e4f
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>
> I sent in a question approximately two weeks ago about the fact that the
> new SL 6.3 iso (came out in December) simply will not boot in a multiboot
> system with grub2, while there is no problem getting the version of SL 6.3
> which came out last August to boot in the same multiboot system. Obviously
> something was changed which limits SL 6.3 bootability on a grub2 multiboot
> machine (or usb device).

Sorry I did not see a question from you.

>
> So far I have received no reply.
>
> It does not seem logical that a newer version of SL 6.3 iso reduces its
> capabilities for its users rather than enhancing them.

I am confused about "SL 6.3 iso (came out in December)" vs "SL 6.3 which 
came out last August" .  We did not release a SL 6.3 in December.  Can you 
give me details (urls) of the iso images in question.

Thanks

-Connie Sieh

>
> Thanks,
>
> Don
>
> --e89a8ff1c63093d87c04d49d4e4f
> Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> I sent in a question approximately two weeks ago about the fact that the ne=
> w SL 6.3 iso (came out in December) simply will not boot in a multiboot sys=
> tem with grub2, while there is no problem getting the version of SL 6.3 whi=
> ch came out last August to boot in the same multiboot system. Obviously som=
> ething was changed which limits SL 6.3 bootability on a grub2 multiboot mac=
> hine (or usb device).<br>
> <br>So far I have received no reply.<br><br>It does not seem logical that a=
> newer version of SL 6.3 iso reduces its capabilities for its users rather =
> than enhancing them. <br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Don<br>
>
> --e89a8ff1c63093d87c04d49d4e4f--
>