Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:24:09 +0200 |
Content-Type: | multipart/signed |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:24:32PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 6/12/07, Donald E Tripp <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >This is a question I hear fairly frequently on both SL and CentOS forums.
> >Here's my two cents.
See also http://www.redhat.com/rhel/migrate/whichlinux/ for Red Hat's
POV on the differences between RHEL and Fedora.
> >RHEL/SL/CenOS is a world class stable operating system. It got that way by
> >being refined over time, and it stays that way from a continuos flow of
> >quality bug fixes and updates. With a release cycle of 36 months,
more like 18-24 months, where 18 is the desired release cycle, but 24
is the effective one. In general RHEL release cycles are targeting 3
Fedora release targets, e.g. 3x6 months = 18 months. There is a
mapping like RHEL3 ~= FC0 (RHL9), RHEL4 ~= FC3, RHEL5 ~= FC6, RHEL6 ~=
FC9.
> >and life-time of 5-6 years,
7 years
> >RHEL/SL/CentOS is the desired platform for server operating systems
> >and mission critical systems.
> >
> >Fedora is like the baby brother; the one who wants all the new toys.
> >Fedora's release cycle of 18 months puts it way ahead of any of the RHEL
> >clones. Fedora has an estimated life-time of 3 years. I just recently read
> >that they were dropping support for FC1 and FC2 because of lack of use /
> >limited space. so FC3 is probably close behind.
> >
>
> Pretty much but the Fedora release cycle is 6-9 months and the life
> cycle is estimated to be 18 to 24 months versus 3 years. FC3 and FC4
> have been end-of-lifed for a while. FC5 will be end of lifed soon. The
> future plans of Fedora will be to release regularly in October and
> April. This means that FC8 will be only a 4 month development cycle
> with a 1 month beta cycle. FC9 will be a 5 month development cycle
> with a 1 month beta cycle. Support will become 18 months I think.
Support is 13 months, or more precisely two release cycles (a 6
months) + 1 month. When the releases slip the EOL date slips as well
as to be next-to-next release plus a month. Since Fedora wants to keep
the May Day/Halloween release cycles (which is why F8 has so little
time) this means that 2 releases will almost always match up to ~12
months.
The intention is to allow Fedora users to skip a release and upgrade
from say FC5 to F7, e.g. have a 1 month window to perform yearly
upgrade instead of half-yearly.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
|
|
|