SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:29:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (90 lines)
Repo's that work well with Scientific Linux

   Adobe
   Atrpms
   Dag
   Epel

Note1: Dag and Atrpm's usually play nice together.  But sometimes having Dag 
and/or Atrpms enabled at the same time as EPEL causes some conflicts. 
Sometimes not.

I believe we are also quite compatible with
  centos-extras
But I haven't had time to check them out as much.

Troy

Michael Mansour wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> When you install SL5.2, in /etc/yum.repos.d I expect you to
>> find, as for SL5.1, the following set of files which I interpret as
>> referring to "recommended (and compatible) repos":
>>
>> atrpms.repo, flash.repo, sl-contrib.repo, sl-fastbugs.repo,
>> sl-security.repo, sl-testing.repo, dag.repo, sl-bugfix-52.repo,
>> sl-debuginfo.repo, sl.repo, sl-srpms.repo
>>
>> The repos are enabled by having "enabled=1" instead of "enabled=0"
>> lines in their corresponding files.  Only the sl and sl-security
>> ones are enabled by default.
> 
> These days I also always use the epel repo for my SL servers, which is
> available as a yum install from SL5 series servers:
> 
> # rpm -q yum-conf-epel
> yum-conf-epel-5-1.noarch
> 
> For the SL4 ones, I just grab the epel RPM from fedora:
> 
> # rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo
> epel-release-4-6
> 
> Maybe Connie or Troy could make a yum-conf-epel for SL4 servers?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael.
> 
>> Steven Yellin
>>
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Claudiu Tanaselia wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I used SL Linux a few years ago and now I'm back, hopefully for a
>>> longer time than before. I've searched the list for the following
>>> question but didn't find a clear answer, so here it goes and please
>>> apologize if the question was answered before: what are the (most)
>>> recommended (and compatible) repos to use with SL 5.2 distribution?
>>> (not considering the official ones, for updates and security patches,
>>> provided by SL team). I've seen that livna only supports Fedora and
>>> I'm not very familliar with rpm-based repos. Others I found where DAG
>>> and ATrpms. I don't know if I remember correct, but I think that last
>>> time I've enabled a non-oficial repository, compatible with RHEL, and
>>> succesfully used it with SL.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> --
>>> Claudiu Tanaselia
>>> Researcher
>>>
>>> Research Institute for
>>> Analytical Instrumentation (ICIA)
>>> Donath 67
>>> 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
>>>
>>> Tel  +40 264 420 590
>>> Fax  +40 264 420 667
>>> Cell +40 744 670 782
>>>
> ------- End of Original Message -------


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2